Farming on Social Media – The Dreaded Activists

The new way to fight

In my first blog I broke down the relationship farmers have with social media. Last week I expanded on this by writing about the effects social media has on farmers’ mental health. This week I want to continue with something a little charged, before ending this series with a lighter subject. Today I’m writing about activists and the war they wage against farmers through social media. 

Activists can provide a lot of good for the world. They are brave people who see something they feel conflicts with their ethical code and they speak out against it. A lot of good can come from activism: environmental efforts have been made, justice has been served and animals have been saved. We need activists to keep the world ethical as we progress, but what happens when activism takes an ugly turn? When activists don’t do their homework, turn aggressive or go against the law?

Hashtag Activism

Everyone wants to be heard and with social media everyone can be heard. Anyone can make a statement about the way things are and that statement might be seen by a couple friends or perhaps thousands of people. Activists use social media to get their message out there. With Hashtag Activism, anyone can get behind a cause with a simple hashtag in a tweet. It’s “slacktivism” at its finest. A person can feel like they are helping without leaving the comforts of their couch, which soothes their ethics alarm and leaves them feeling good about themselves. 

The problem with slacktivism (or hashtag activism) is that it often lacks both fact checking and productivity. People often jump on a bandwagon without checking to see if information is true. PETA, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, is a major activist organization that relies on shock campaigns, fear mongering, celebrity endorsements and untruths. They use social media to put out campaigns that encourage slacktivists to donate through shock, disgust and guilt. Investigations into PETA show that they use misinformation to collect revenue. The average person isn’t going to look deeply into the facts with proper research sources. They just want to save the cute and sad faces of their animal friends. This leads to a strained relationship between consumers and the agriculture industry that activists tend to target. 

“Slacktivism”

On the Attack

The activists that target farmers through social media are often aggressive – essentially bullies. They believe strongly in their code of ethics. Animals should not be consumed or kept in captivity. The land should not be changed to grow more crops and there shouldn’t be any genetically modified organisms or anything added to our food. 

These are all perfectly reasonable beliefs. I also dislike the idea of antibiotics in my food or poorly treated livestock. What divides us are the facts. I know that Canadian farmers are held to strict regulations that do not allow for antibiotics to end up in food or for livestock to be abused. I know this firsthand as I am held to those regulations.

With a little research, myths can be dispelled. Unfortunately, aggressive activists are often uninterested in dispelling myths. They are set in their beliefs and no amount of discussion will change them. They go on the attack, they make uncomfortable statements and threaten the wellbeing of the farmers. Tired of being called horrible names, some farmers took to social media with the truth about what they do.

Transparency.

Caught In Between

Consumers sit on either side of the battlefield. Activists make them wary and suspicious and they start asking important questions. These questions are fair to ask. We should all know where our food comes from. For a long time, activists were the only voices on social media and a gap began to form between farmers and consumers. Now, with farmers joining consumers and activists in the conversation, we get a better, more complete picture. Farmers have nothing to hide and they are proud of the work they do. Social media gives them the opportunity to share that with consumers and to keep both sides of the story available for the consumer to make up their own mind. 

Long Story Short

Activism is not a bad thing. Without animal rights activists there would not be the animal welfare regulations that we have. Without environmental activists we may not have realized what kind of damage we were once doing to our farm land. It is important to innovate and grow and farmers are not against that. Where things seem to go wrong is when the activism turns aggressive on social media. Past President Barack Obama had this to say about social media activism: “That’s not bringing about change. If all you’re doing is casting stones, you’re probably not going to get that far.”  

Real world change comes when you make real world efforts. Bullying is all that comes from clashing ethics online. That said, some real world activists have crossed the line too. Real world activists have sometimes been breaking laws, trespassing on private property, tampering with food safety and causing the deaths of animals by accident. People need to take the time to do their research before joining a cause. They should first try to understand their opposition before going on the attack.

Without getting too personal: how do you feel about activists online? Do they inspire positive change? Or have people already made up their minds and are just fighting? Are farmers handling their interactions with their critics effectively? 

https://bit.ly/2HssgHO

Resources

Gilmore, S. (2014, November 11). The Problem with Slacktivism.
https://www.macleans.ca/society/the-real-problem-with-slacktivism/

AgDaily Staff. (2018, July 9). Here’s how PETA is a nest of lies and against agriculture.
https://www.agdaily.com/video/heres-how-peta-is-a-nest-of-lies-and-against-agriculture/

Way, M. (2019, August 9). Canadian farmers accuse vegan activists of cyberbullying.
www.raisevegan.com/canadian-farmers-accuse-vegan-activists-of-cyberbullying/

Dieticians of Canada. (2020). Hormones and antibiotics in food production.
https://www.unlockfood.ca/en/articles/farming-food-production/hormones-and-antibiotics-in-food-production.aspx

The Canadian Press. 2015, December 5). Ontario passes new animal welfare legislation with stiffer penalties.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ontario-passes-new-animal-welfare-legislation-1.5386282

Such, P. (2019. November 1). Is posting on social media a valid form of activism?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/petersuciu/2019/11/01/is-posting-on-social-media-a-valid-form-of-activisim/#4e36b9dd21cc

Brown, D. (2019, December 20). Animal activism meets farm protection in Ontario anti-trespassing bill.
https://lfpress.com/news/local-news/animal-activism-meets-farm-protection-in-ontario-anti-trespassing-bill

PETA Website
www.peta.org

3 thoughts on “Farming on Social Media – The Dreaded Activists

  1. I really enjoyed reading your blog (and seeing your artwork). It is actually quite ironic that I read this today as I was dealing with such a situation this week at work. Someone started an online petition about a subject, giving email and social media addresses and now people from around the world are “signing” without really knowing what is the issue or the truth behind it.

  2. Thanks for the post.

    This seems to be a growing trend. I’ve read stories of activists trespassing onto farmers land to ‘make a point’ from their perspective. I agree that some forms of activism are good, but when the sole purpose is to bully someone that you don’t agree with, then that a problem. Unfortunately, this is becoming more common. As someone with no relations to farming, I don’t believe the vast majority of farmers have mischievous characteristics in the way they treat livestock. Its their livelihood, oftentimes that has been passed along from previous generations. They take their profession seriously and it makes no sense to engage in practices that will harm that. Transparency is key and the more of it there is, I think the better both sides would be.

  3. I find online activism intimidating, but I guess that is because I don’t know the full story and as you say we need to do our homework. Even when I believe in a cause I have declined to sign a petition from not being comfortable with the message and a sense that the action is too severe. I don’t like that I have not taken a stance and the answer is to do my homework and either be able to take action or not, knowing I have done the research and understand both sides of the story. This is an important lesson as I create my own story of plastics and recyclability. Thanks for the timely topic.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.