Never mind the MOMA, the ROM, the Tate or the National Gallery, There’s a new curator in town and it’s you!

courtest of pixabay:

In 1987 I stood in front of a broken wheelbarrow. The axel smashed and the wheel lays a few feet away. I was not on grandpa’s farm, or in the family garden. I was at a prestigious art gallery. The wheelbarrow? Not junk, not a tool in need of repair; it was a symbol of human labour. An artist created the piece, a curator decided it was worthy of display and there I stood. The exact same thing could be found in sheds, barns and garages across the country. I didn’t get it. I thought it was crap. I felt scammed. I also had no significant art history education, no context and whether something was art or not pretty much boiled down to “Does it appeal to ME?”.

There is, in North America, a long history of mistrust of art. Particularly the art found in galleries. In 1975 Tom Wolfe wrote in ‘The Painted World‘ “The notion that the public accepts or rejects anything in modern art is merely romantic fiction. The game is completed and the trophies distributed long before the public knows what has happened.” Canadians will be familiar with Barnett Newman’s “Voice of Fire“. A huge painting of an orange stripe on a blue background. There was outrage when it was purchased in 1990 that, to a degree, continues to this day.

We seem to be distrustful of art that is defined by critics, curators and collectors.

This is changing.

The public now has more influence over what goes on in galleries than ever before. Since the mid-2000s, many of us have started using social media. There are websites dedicated to the sharing of art. Deviant Art, according to Wikipedia is the largest online artists community. The site allows artists and patrons to post work where it is critiqued, discussed and shared via social media channels such as Facebook and Twitter. There are many Facebook groups where people share art they like. On Pinterest, you can find carefully curated galleries on everything from Renaissance art, to abstract expressionism to macramé. Popular opinion on an exhibit is quickly spread through Twitter, Facebook and Google reviews.

According to the CBC,  Thousands are lining up online for a selfie with AGO’s blockbuster Infinity Mirrors. The show is so popular on social media that Leah Sandals, and editor at Canadian Art says she is experiencing ‘social media exhaustion’.

I’m not sure what to make of this. Art is for the people. Perhaps social media is democratizing the art world. In the Washington Post article ‘Everybody’s an Art Curator‘ Ellen Gamerman writes about galleries in America that are deciding what does and doesn’t get shown in art galleries based on Twitter votes. Museums are crowdsourcing the curation of exhibits. This could have huge benefits in engaging people in the arts.

I do have concerns though. Art is not always popular. In the mid-nineteenth century, impressionism was seen as garbage. Today, thanks to dedicated collectors, we can enjoy the work of Monet and Van Gogh. Is there a line between amateur and professional curators? For me, there is a difference between good art and important art. Good art is the stuff I like. Important art contributes to the historical creative dialogue, spanning centuries and cultures. I’m not sure that in today’s climate, the National Gallery would have been able to successfully purchase Voice of Fire. That would have been unfortunate, by any measure it was a valuable investment.

What do you think? Is it fantastic that we can now use social media to influence what’s in galleries, particularly public galleries, or are we losing out when the voices of professional curators and art historians are drowned out?

Twitter: There’s new people in charge at major #art #galleries and it’s us! Are you the new art snob?

Facebook: We now have unprecedented influence in art exhibits at major galleries. Are you ready to curate some of the biggest shows on earth?

6 thoughts on “Never mind the MOMA, the ROM, the Tate or the National Gallery, There’s a new curator in town and it’s you!

  1. I haven’t had a chance to look at this but I heard about this art installation and have been meaning to check it out. Are the social media posts part of the art installation?

  2. There are some really cool apps for galleries and art in general.

    This was a great post. I started off my BA in visual arts before switching to English and have had many a debate over the years when people think that their children could paint better than the abstract expressionists (Rothko, Pollock, Kline, etc.). For many of us, abstract art, installations, and modern art are confusing. There is a disconnect because it is seen as not complex or have any historical context. Although the skills of abstract expressionism look easy to emulate, we forget the emotions behind the work and that the artists were all classically trained in the more formal art styles. Also overlooked is that Pollock pioneered a completely new art style which radically departs from traditional painting in terms of not only the technique, but in material and overall aesthetic.

    • Agreed. Pollock is the only person I can think of off the top of my head who managed to bust out of the grid imposed by the borders of the canvas. I think one of the things that happens with art is that most of us are not taught art literacy. We are not taught how to appreciate the arts. It’s sort of what I was trying to get at when I mentioned art I like vs art that is important. I am wondering about the next turns of western art history when so much is dictated by the desire of tweets. I cant decide how I feel about that.

  3. I was at the AGO last year with my kids several of the paintings now have iPads with them and they are using augmented reality as a way to keep the kids engaged. I was talking to one of the employees who said they needed to find a way to engage the kids in the art as most didn’t have an interest, I thought that was pretty sad. My kids enjoyed the iPads but, my son who’s always drawing was really into looking at the paintings and was amazed about how paint could be used to achieve get different effects.

    Art is always subjective to each individual. People love Picasso’s cubism but, I actually prefer his realistic portrait work. The same with Warhol people love his silk screen pop art but, many don’t know he started his career as a commercial illustrator and I like that work more.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.