COM0011 Blog#1 Is Physical Health the Most Important Factor in Fitness for Office?

The uncertainty over Hilary Clinton’s health has the media and others playing doctor and barking out questions. How bad is her pneumonia? When did she find out she had it and why didn’t she inform the public immediately?

In our age of instant communication, privacy is virtually impossible for a presidential candidate. Thus it was probably a mistake for Clinton and her handlers to attempt to keep the illness under wraps. But I can’t help thinking that these kinds of intrusions that politicians must subject themselves to in 2016 would have meant that one of America’s greatest leaders would have never become President much less been re-elected three times.

Franklin Delano Roosevelt declared to the world in his inaugural address to U.S. citizens in 1933, “The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.”

Roosevelt spent his life conquering fear. He authored the “New Deal,” a game-changing social policy that helped the world emerge from the clutches of the great depression and slashed the U.S. unemployment rate from 25% to 2%. FDR pioneered programs like social security that we take for granted today. He guided the U.S. through World War II. Without his leadership, the Nazis and their allies may have won.

And yet Roosevelt was paralyzed from the waist down after being diagnosed with  polio while vacationing at the family’s summer home in New Brunswick at the age of 39. During his time in office, he and his aides went to great lengths to downplay his physical limitations. News photographers were warned not to take pictures that would show the extent of his disability. Those who defied the edict would sometimes have their film seized by secret service agents.

fdr-exiting-car-1932

In the today’s social media environment, there would be no way that FDR could have disguised his illness. The speculation about his health and the efforts of political enemies to raise doubts about his fitness for office may have killed his candidacy which would have deprived the U.S. and the rest of the world of a great leader.

So how much do we really need to know about a candidate’s health?

Canada has laws in place to protect employees from discrimination and to ensure that those who have had a bout of cancer or been treated for depression are not shut out of the job market.  The privacy of our health records are protected by law.

Are politicians an exception? Do we need to know that they’re full of youthful vigour and up to the rigours of the 24/7 demands of public office?

The cigar chomping Winston Churchill was a senior citizen when he led the fight against Hitler between 1939 and 1945. He was in his mid seventies when elected Prime Minister in 1951 and presided over a cabinet meeting the day after he suffered his second stroke in 1953. None of his ministers were aware of what had happened.

These examples should be kept in mind as the video of Hilary Clinton collapsing while getting into black van is replayed over and over again on news broadcasts and shared on social media. Doctors and pundits can do their best to diagnose a person’s physical health. Strength of character may be harder to measure but I believe it is far more important in assessing a candidate’s fitness for office.

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “COM0011 Blog#1 Is Physical Health the Most Important Factor in Fitness for Office?

  1. I think this is a great point. It brings to mind for me the most recent Canadian federal election, where many criticized the young and healthy Justin Trudeau as lacking experience. Which make me wonder, according to world of internet political critics, is there perhaps a magic age that marries political savvy and physical stamina?

    • Thanks Taylor, don’t think there is a magic age though. History tells us that some of the greats were relatively young like John F Kennedy and others were older like Gandhi and Mandela. I guess we need to make our decisions based on what each individual has to bring to the table.

  2. Great post, Mike. I can understand why Clinton’s team waited so long to go public with her illness – the old maxim of “don’t feed the trolls”. But on the other hand, Trump’s strong social media presence has proven over and over that you ignore him at your peril, and by waiting as long as they did, they lost control of the narrative.

    There is a post circulating on Facebook right now with about 14,000 shares, that I hope will refocus public attention around fitness for office in the U.S.:

    (This is my first attempt at embedding an image on a website, so fingers crossed!)

    https://www.facebook.com/plugins/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fphoto.php%3Ffbid%3D10153930662562781%26set%3Da.10150669951882781.393179.535082780%26type%3D3&width=500

    Using social media to fight social media really seems to be the way forward in politics.

    • Thanks Bronwyn, indeed much of the political battles are being fought on social media and the health issue plays into Trump’s story line that Hilary is not up for the job. But complicating things for Hilary is the fact that she has a toxic relationship with the media and has a reputation for secrecy. Hopefully, this is the equivalent of a cold and she’ll be back on the hustings soon.

  3. Hello Mike: I really enjoyed reading your post – well written, excellent flow and very apropos to our course. I also appreciated the references made to the stories of other heads of state to back-up your opinion,. This made your point more evidence-based, not only a personal view. And I could not agree with you more about the fearsome possibility that Roosevelt would have never become president three times (because of his paralysis), if he had been subject to today’s social media intrusions on politicians. The situation reminds me of the notion that some of man’s greatest inventions (i.e. tool, technology) were intended for greater good or advance our lives yet became man’s enemy when not used properly. Sometimes I think that we are still at a experimental stage with social media and we will eventually learn how to use it more respectfully, particularly in the context of privacy and intrusion. And then sometimes, I think that it’s going to continue to used like an “open season” situation. As for now, social media with its good and ugly sides is omnipresent and politicians cannot run away from it, in health and in sickness. It will influence people’s judgment, including running for not for office. It’s not fair but it is what it is. On the more positive side, social media with great blog pieces like your s has the power to galvanize people.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s